South African aquaculture success lies with government

South African aquaculture success lies with government

The success of the tilapia industry in South Africa is largely dependent on government’s attitude to the industry, and the legislation implemented to control it. Government should consider several factors when deciding on the industry’s future.

Stop wasting public money
Public money should not be wasted on schemes that have failed in other countries around the world. For example, simplistic ‘turnkey’ systems such as the notorious ‘cut-down JoJo tanks coupled to a pump’ will not feed rural communities, neither will complex systems that require technical skills.

Similarly, as Asia learned 30 years ago, scraping by with low-quality, mixed-sex fingerlings in poorly designed systems will only result in failure.

Furthermore, public money should not be wasted on constructing or rebuilding hatcheries when private hatcheries already fulfil that role. This money should rather be spent on securing offtake agreements with private hatcheries, which will stimulate production, thereby guaranteeing business and securing the sector.

Conservation and quality feed
Government should ensure that good-quality fish feed is available at an economically viable price. Fifteen years ago, Egypt stimulated its burgeoning aquaculture industry by subsidising feed mills for this purpose. Government should also ensure that conservation agencies concentrate on conservation, and not on permits.

Conservation entails protecting threatened indigenous species. If local species are threatened, we need positive stories about the sanctuaries that have been constructed for conservation, not negative stories about those who have been prosecuted for farming an alien species without a ‘permit’ in a closed system.

The state must accept that Nile tilapia are established in Limpopo and Incomati systems, and should allow farmers to invest in regional pond farms. Fighting the use of good tilapia strains will negate the goals of Operation Phakisa, and will only serve to stimulate frustration, backyard development and the contravention of laws.

Government should also use a single permitting system. The multiple permitting system achieves nothing and wastes time and effort. For example, a hatchery currently needs three permits to sell Nile tilapia fingerlings. In issuing permits, government must also ensure transparency and fairness. Currently, some applicants have to complete risk assessments to obtain permits, while others do not.

Meetings and efficiency
Government should remember that not everyone lives in Pretoria. Therefore, when important meetings are to be held and stakeholders are invited, the travel expenses of those living far away from the venue should be compensated.

Only then will government obtain a representative perspective of the sector. Information should be communicated to stakeholders immediately, so that action can be taken. It should not be necessary for stakeholders to request the minutes three months after the meeting.

Parastatals such as Eskom should also become more efficient, as low voltage and extended power cuts are killing the sector.

Previous Oxfam Zambia to give out farm inputs
Next Proposed sugar tax in SA will cause extensive job losses

About author

You might also like

Government told to address cotton production challenges

The Cotton Development Trust (CDT) has bemoaned lack of mechanisation and under-utilisation of farming land, as stumbling blocks to the country’s cotton yields. Lwisya Silwimba, Director at CDT said Zambia

International 0 Comments

Boosting agricultural production in eastern and southern Africa

Leading organisations in agricultural policy, trade and technology transfer met in Nairobi from 13 -14 December 2018 to identify the implementation of harmonised seed regulations within the eastern and southern

Africa 0 Comments

Private sector financed farm in the pipeline for Copperbelt

ECM Agri Limited has announced plans to develop a 4000 hectares commercial farm in Zambia’s Copperbelt, along the Luswishi River. With an estimated crop and livestock production cost of about